food safety
‘Mind the W’ Framework
Leafy vegetables such as lettuce, spinach and herbs are often eaten raw or only lightly processed. Because they grow close to the soil and have complex leaf surfaces that can easily shelter microorganisms, they’re especially vulnerable to contamination. With no cooking or kill step before they reach consumers, preventing pathogen transmission becomes critical.
Words Sukhvinder Pal (SP) Singh, Senior Research Scientist, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development; Joel Dinsdale, Quality Assurance Coordinator, vegetablesWA; and, Chris Hall, Total Quality Assurance Systems, WA
TO help growers manage these risks more effectively, the ‘Mind the W’ framework has been developed through the Safe Leafy Veg program, co funded by Hort Innovation and the NSW Government and supported by industry — to turn scientific insights into practical, on farm risk management strategies1 .
Pathogen transmission in leafy vegetables typically originates from faecal sources and occurs through environmental pathways.
Key hazards include pathogenic E. coli, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. These can reach crops through contaminated water, poorly treated manures, wildlife intrusion, windborne dust, flooding, cross contamination during washing, or inadequate worker hygiene.
Because these pathways are so varied and interconnected, a systems based approach is essential. The ‘Mind the W’ framework groups risks into seven linked domains (see Figure 1).
Water, Waste from animal operations, Wildlife and animal incursions, Wind from animal operations, Weather extremes, Washing and sanitisation, and Workers’ health and hygiene. Together, they provide a structured and flexible method for proactive risk management.


FIGURE 1. Mind the W Framework2
Source: Adapted from Singh et al., 2025

Surface water sources (e.g. soak) are prone to microbial contamination due to livestock operations in the catchment area.
Water is a major pathway for microbial contamination in leafy vegetables. Surface water sources such as rivers, dams, creeks, and soaks, are dynamic and vulnerable to contamination from livestock runoff, wildlife activity and weather events. When used for overhead irrigation, water comes into direct contact with edible plant surfaces. Research from the Safe Leafy Veg program shows that even water meeting irrigation guidelines (E. coli < 100 CFU/100 mL) can carry bacterial pathogens, with detection rates rising sharply above this threshold. Regular monitoring for indicator organisms like E. coli, combined with catchment level assessments and multi year trend data, is essential. Where risks are elevated, treatment options such as sedimentation, filtration, UV or controlled chlorination may be required.
Water quality often declines after heavy rain, flooding or during warmer months, especially in dams, soaks and rivers. Summer testing frequently reveals adverse results in rainwater tanks as well. However, some operators choose to pump dam water into storage tanks to supplement supply. This practice poses a significant risk because it can introduce pathogens from surface water into on site storage tanks. Whole genome sequencing from the Safe Leafy Veg program confirmed that contamination was transferred from farm dams into rainwater tanks.
Because tank water is routinely used for washing produce and for handwashing, maintaining high microbiological quality is critical. Untreated surface water should not be used to top up tanks, and tanks should be cleaned and flushed on a preventative schedule, ideally at least annually, and more often where risks exist, alongside regular sanitiser dosing. Postharvest wash water must meet potable standards (E. coli < 1 CFU/100 mL) and contain an effective sanitiser to prevent cross contamination.
Waste from animal operations, particularly manure-based soil amendments, presents another significant risk if not properly managed. Pathogens can persist in soil for long periods and easily move onto crops through splash, dust, or contaminated equipment. Using validated composting processes that reach the right time–temperature combinations is essential for reducing these risks. Just as important are proper storage practices, clear documentation of amendment sources and application dates, and measures that prevent cross contamination between compost, crops and equipment.
Wildlife and animal incursions are unpredictable and can be major sources of contamination. Salmonella is frequently isolated from native wildlife, including quokkas, kangaroos and wallabies3 . In kangaroos, S. Muenchen and S. Typhimurium are commonly reported, while S. Typhimurium predominates in wallabies. In quokkas, S. Muenchen, S. Adelaide and S. Wandsbek are frequently detected, and S. Rubislaw is typically associated with reptiles. Whole genome sequencing from the Safe Leafy Veg project also showed that detections of S. Muenchen and S. Rubislaw were linked with wildlife activity on vegetable farms and in packing sheds.
Wild and domesticated animals may deposit faeces directly in fields, contaminating soil, produce, irrigation water and packing areas. Where intrusion or faecal contamination occurs, exclusion zones should be established and affected produce withheld from harvest. Mitigation measures include fencing, netting, rodent control, habitat management and thorough pre harvest inspections. Strong worker awareness and training support timely detection and response. Postharvest facilities should also be managed to keep out pets and wildlife such as marsupials, rodents and reptiles.
Wind is a less visible but significant transmission pathway, especially when leafy vegetable fields are located near intensive livestock operations. Dust and aerosols carrying pathogens can travel long distances and settle on crops or enter open packing sheds. Strategic site selection, buffer zones and vegetative windbreaks help reduce airborne contamination risks. Understanding the broader landscape and neighbouring land uses is therefore key to managing microbial hazards.
Weather extremes such as flooding, heavy rainfall, drought, dust storms and bushfires can amplify contamination risks. Flooding can bring contaminated water directly into production areas, often making crops unsafe for harvest4 . Heavy rainfall increases runoff and splash dispersal of pathogens, while drought and dust storms promote airborne contamination. Bushfires may displace wildlife, which, in search of shelter, water or food, can enter fields and water sources and contaminate produce. Effective management requires pre emptive planning, post event assessments, clear documentation of weather impacts and, where needed, harvest exclusion zones.
Washing and sanitisation are critical control points in postharvest handling, but can themselves become sources of cross-contamination if poorly managed. Inadequate sanitiser concentrations, high organic loads or insufficient water replacement can allow pathogens to spread from a small number of contaminated leaves to an entire batch. Potable wash water, careful monitoring of sanitiser efficacy, and validated cleaning programs are essential.
Equipment should be routinely cleaned and sanitised to prevent biofilm formation. Washing reduces microbial load but does not eliminate all pathogens, reinforcing the need for strong upstream controls.
Workers’ health and hygiene remain fundamental to food safety. Human handling during harvesting and processing can introduce contamination, if proper hygiene practices are not followed. Access to handwashing facilities, illness reporting procedures, appropriate protective clothing and regular training, are critical components of a strong food safety culture. Empowering workers to recognise risks and take ownership of preventive actions strengthens the entire system.
The ‘Mind the W’ framework underscores that no single control is enough. Each “W” is a potential risk point, and weakness in one can affect the rest.
Effective risk management depends on multiple, consistent layers of protection across preharvest and postharvest activities. This integrated, science based approach helps reduce pathogen risks and maintain safe, reliable produce. Food safety relies on systems thinking, continual monitoring and shared responsibility.
MORE INFORMATION
For further information on the Safe Leafy Veg program, contact Dr SP Singh at sp.singh@dpird.nsw.gov.au or 0420 593 129.
Acknowledgment
This project (VG22002) has been funded by Hort Innovation using the vegetable research and development levy and funds from the Australian and NSW Governments.
1 Singh SP, 2025. Microbial food safety risk management in leafy vegetables. NSW DPIRD. www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_ file/0006/1623507/Microbial-food-safety-risk-management-in-leafy-vegetables.pdf
2 Singh SP, Shadbolt C, Cusack D and Turner M, 2025. ‘Mind the W’: bridging gaps in the production and supply of safe leafy vegetables. Food Australia, 77 (4): 29-32.
3 Anonymous, 2025. Salmonella in Australian marsupials. Fact Sheet March 2025 https://wildlifehealthaustralia.com.au/Portals/0/ ResourceCentre/FactSheets/Mammals/Salmonella_in_Australian_marsupials.pdf
4 Singh SP, 2023. Flooding adversely affects fresh produce safety. Microbiology Australia 44, 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1071/MA23054